<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Rob McKenna talks about Distressed Property law at REAPS</title>
	<atom:link href="http://deandretske.com/rob-mckenna-talks-about-distressed-property-law-at-reaps/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://deandretske.com/rob-mckenna-talks-about-distressed-property-law-at-reaps</link>
	<description>Intersection of Software Development, Internet Marketing and Real Estate Investing, Martial Arts, and all of my other interests!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 21 Aug 2011 19:56:30 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joe Kaiser</title>
		<link>http://deandretske.com/rob-mckenna-talks-about-distressed-property-law-at-reaps/comment-page-1#comment-17</link>
		<dc:creator>Joe Kaiser</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Aug 2008 04:25:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ddretske.topproducerblogs.com/?p=87#comment-17</guid>
		<description>Restore the original version?

Rob took to the podium to describe the original version which focused on the 82% thing, and got it completely wrong, even though he read directly from the statute. He described 82% of the seller&#039;s equity as being key. The law has nothing to do with equity.

Why would you want to restore that nonsense when the AG himself can&#039;t even figure out his own law.

More importantly, the AG&#039;s office has received four foreclosure rescue scam complaints in the last five years. They did not prosecute any of them under.

They did, in fact prosecute me, having done 300 foreclosure transactions without a single complaint. The pressured and bullied and threatened my partner into settling, and that&#039;s the only so-called success they&#039;ve had in this regard.

I, on the other hand, will not settle and will have my day in court to expose this nonsense for what it is.

Finally, the AG&#039;s office was involved with the new legislation every step of the way. AAG Jim Sugarman testified in favor of the new and final version of the bill. Suggesting the AG&#039;s office was against it is simply not true.

Joe Kaiser</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Restore the original version?</p>
<p>Rob took to the podium to describe the original version which focused on the 82% thing, and got it completely wrong, even though he read directly from the statute. He described 82% of the seller&#8217;s equity as being key. The law has nothing to do with equity.</p>
<p>Why would you want to restore that nonsense when the AG himself can&#8217;t even figure out his own law.</p>
<p>More importantly, the AG&#8217;s office has received four foreclosure rescue scam complaints in the last five years. They did not prosecute any of them under.</p>
<p>They did, in fact prosecute me, having done 300 foreclosure transactions without a single complaint. The pressured and bullied and threatened my partner into settling, and that&#8217;s the only so-called success they&#8217;ve had in this regard.</p>
<p>I, on the other hand, will not settle and will have my day in court to expose this nonsense for what it is.</p>
<p>Finally, the AG&#8217;s office was involved with the new legislation every step of the way. AAG Jim Sugarman testified in favor of the new and final version of the bill. Suggesting the AG&#8217;s office was against it is simply not true.</p>
<p>Joe Kaiser</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

